Category: Dialogue (Page 12 of 13)

What is your view of the West Midlands’ music industry? by Mark Iron Man Records

What is your view of the West Midlands’ music industry? In particular, what are our strengths and weaknesses?

Here’s something I wrote in 2007, if anyone would like to take the title of this blog post and write their own version then please do, the more thoughts and opinions the better. I don’t know it all, I am only familiar with my small area of activity within the so called “Music Industry.”

Written by Mark Iron Man Records, Birmingham, June 2007

Wikipedia defines the Music Industry as “the business industry connected with the creation and sale of music. It consists of record companies, labels and publishers that distribute recorded music products internationally and that often control the rights to those products. Some music labels are “independent,” while others are subsidiaries of larger corporate entities or international media groups. The world music market is currently dominated by the “big four” record groups, Sony BMG, EMI, Universal and Warner, each of which consists of many smaller companies and labels serving under different regions and markets.“ (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_industry) As far as the West Midlands is concerned, I would suggest that The music industry is a term most people use to describe a range of music-related businesses and organisations including community groups and not-for-profit organisations and others such as Musicians’ Unions and writers’ copyright collectives and performance rights organisations.

In order to look at the West Midlands Industry I sometimes find it helpful to imagine what the “West Midlands Music Industry” might consist of (in general terms) in a simplistic, imaginary world and then look to see if this is demonstrated to be true in practice.

Continue reading

Music “Manifesto of Independence” written by Jonone100 2009

The history of the present King of Music [RIAA] is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over Music. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

They have persecuted through the courts people guilty of no other crime than the enjoyment of music.

They have treated the Internet with contempt.

They have misused and abused the power of authority by representing their own interests as if they were those of the Creators.

They have attempted to impose their will by nefarious means across national borders so as to bring into submission all people of the Internet.

They have made people afraid to listen to music on the greatest medium of modern times by denying their right to privacy.

They have prevented the free association of music, technology and people by the use of DRM.

They have misrepresented their interests by claiming that they invest in the development of new music whereas in truth their interests are best served by protecting and exploiting those rights which they already own.

They have colluded with broadcasters to feed the audience bland and unhealthy fare whilst themselves getting fat and lazy on the proceeds of their misdeeds.

They have knowingly confused and conflated in the minds of both Artists and the public the seperate and distinct notions of price and value, such that as music’s money price grows its true value declines.

They have, and continue to, put stars in the eyes of our young, fostered their belief in a perverted cause which fetishises money and fame, and then cast them aside empty and desolate whilst continuing to profit from their demise even after death.

They have taken Music, which should be freely shared amongst people to grant them understanding, beauty and truth, and chained it to their own financial destinies constraining the evolution of Music and denying to the people what was freely given.

They make profane, what is sacred.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. An Institution whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of Music.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to the music business. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legal teams to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement in cyberland. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united independent music artists, in General Cyberspace, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by the Authority of the good People of Music, solemnly publish and declare, That we are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent Artists; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the RIAA, and that all political connection between them and the Old Music Industry, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent Artists, they have full Power to write Songs, play Music, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent Artists may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

Please express your support for the Declaration by releasing your music so it can be freely shared.

read the rest here: http://jonone100.blogspot.com/2009/01/manifesto-of-independence.html

Fran Nevrkla on Copyright Term update January 2009

Dear Friends and Colleagues
 

Firstly, I hope that all of you together with your loved ones had a thoroughly enjoyable and restful Christmas and New Year holiday. 

Now that we are all back in the fray, I thought I would drop you a line about one of the key issues currently on our agenda. As you know, our recent and very intensive political lobbying has paid off – thanks to your efforts. The video message(www.ppluk.com/fairplay) to the Prime Minister and the letters to MPs have got through.

Just before Christmas, the Government announced a change of heart on copyright term. In his speech to the Creators’ Conference, Andy Burnham revealed that they have now accepted that the term should be extended in principle, although they still fall short of offering performers parity with other creators. We will continue to talk to them about moving to 95 years.

Our focus is now shifting to Europe where the draft Copyright Term Directive is being debated. There are two crucial votes coming up in the European Parliament in February and March. We have already been talking to many of the MEPs (Members of the European Parliament), urging them to support us. If you would like to help further in the Fair Play for Musicians campaign, then you could write to your MEP, urging him/her to vote for the Copyright Term Directive. The main points to make are below. Just choose two or three to include in your email:

 
  • Performers get a much shorter copyright term than other creators – composers, authors, lyricists, graphic artists and photographers.
  • Performers are as crucial as other creators in making a record.
  • Royalties (eg PPL airplay) from recordings are important (however large or small).
  • There is no effect on consumers (eg iTunes charge the same price for in- and out-of-copyright recordings).
  • When recordings go out of copyright, others profit but the performers get nothing.
  • Support the draft Copyright Term Directive which increases the copyright term for both performers and producers to 95 years from release (the same as the USA and on a par with other creators who get life plus seventy years).

You could also ask them if they will be supporting this Directive. We will put the names of all supportive MEPs on the PPL website. Make sure your MEP is added to the list!

You can find your MEP by looking at the European Parliament website http://www.europarl.org.uk/uk_meps/MembersMain.htm. If you click on your region, you will find a list of half a dozen MEPs, all of whom represent you in Europe, with their email addresses. If you are feeling strong, send an email to each of them, and copy my colleaguedominic.mcgonigal@ppluk.com.

Many thanks again for your support in this. That support is showing results and we are determined that in these final stages we get the copyright term that you deserve.

Watch this space and in the meantime, on behalf of all of us here at PPL, I offer our very best wishes for 2009.

Kind regards

Fran

FRAN NEVRKLA
Chairman & CEO

PPL
1 Upper James Street, London W1F 9DE 
+44 (0)20 7534 1000 / F +44 (0)20 7534 1111

WATCH OUR VIDEO MESSAGE TO GORDON BROWN AT www.ppluk.com/fairplay

Posted via email from Iron Man Records

Free MP3 Streaming is one thing, Free downloading is another…..or is it?

Can you give away MP3 downloads of your music for FREE and increase your sales income?

I think you can but have a look and make up your own mind, here’s a few things i sent to some people i work with for discussion,

listen to this: http://freetail.tumblr.com/post/69439673/bbc-radio-4-program-on-free

have a read of this:

“Is the business model of the future one where the customer no longer pays? Already products in the digital marketplace are being given away free, yet companies are still making profits.
The internet has created a revolution for free products, says Anderson

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7811481.stm

One firm believer in this increasingly common business model is Chris Anderson, editor-in-chief of Wired magazine.
He claims the costs in the digital world are so low that both the companies and their customers are winners. ”

also
http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/2347/125/

and
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1194442

Posted via email from Iron Man Records

More on Music Copyright Law and how long it should last

I just came across this one whilst looking into the whole Copyright thing again. It is dated July so there may have been some discussion between all parties since then but there is clearly a genuine diversity in viewpoint.

If you have any interest in this, you know what to do.

The piece was described as “A musician’s look at the changing music industry” with Jeff Balke – “…..I’m not a huge fan of copyrights, nor am I a some corporate lackey who wants the world to remain for sale to the highest bidder. But, I do understand the practical nature of capitalism and the human nature of musicians. With all due respect to Andrew Dubber, who I respect immensely, his concept may seem like a great idea in theory. In practice, it would be a creative and logistical nightmare.”

well, would it? Read all about it and think for yourself: http://blogs.chron.com/brokenrecord/2008/07/dubber_copyrights_should_last.html

Posted via email from Iron Man Records

« Older posts Newer posts »